
While proper planning does not always eliminate unexpected problems (like the infamous 2013 NFL Superbowl 34 minute power outage), it is a vital component of implementing a successful 360 degree feedback process.
When the world was introduced to 360 degree feedback (well before Beyonce was born,) the intent was purely developmental. While the controversary around the use of 360 degree feedback is still a topic of discussion, the trend is toward using the data gathered in 360 to support performance evaluation. This pattern, along with the energy around 'Big Data,' has caused us to think of 360 degree feedback data as part of the vast pool of performance and succession measurements. I believe that this is a positive direction however, we should not lose sight of the original intent of development.
Because 360 degree evaluation assesses specific leadership behaviors, and research tells us that these behaviors can be developed through focused development planning efforts, we are looking at a different kind of performance metric. The strengths and development opportunities surfaced through 360 degree feedback is always relevant as roles change and priorities come and go.
Planning for the implementation of 360 degree feedback can be challenging, especially if this type of feedback process is new to your company. We have a responsibility to go to extraordinary means following a 360 process to ensure that participants have the resources they need to improve their skills and performance. Not focusing on development areas that have been cited as needing improvement does a huge disservice to everyone who invested their time and energy in the process. A recent HBR blog post by Jack Zenger highlighted how necessary these training interventions are for leaders (http://bit.ly/UDGyUE) emphasizing how detrimental it may be to allow unproductive behaviors to continue unchecked.
Think about including the following 4 components in your 360 degree feedback implementation plan:
These Related Stories


